Sadha Soudha
Now the Assembly was dull, but the Council was genuinely interesting. No, really. We heard a rather acerbic discussion about the state budget. Finance minister Yediyurappa was present, but HDK was no where to be seen as his camp took a righteous beating from the opposition. Professor Chandrashekhar had a fantastic go at the budget, sarcasm and all. He pointed out glaring mistakes and several appallingly hypocritical comments from HDK's ministry. For example, the introduction to the budget congratulates the Krishna and Singh governments for doing such a wonderful job with infrastucture and agrarian development (haha) and promises to continue the same. This, after years of rivalry and criticism about the very same issues. Strange...
The best part was the way in which the Prof took charge. He never raised his voice, never pointed fingers, was dignified (and sarcastic) throughout and totally blew the budget to pieces. Yediyurappa never said a word.
What was truly interesting though was the contrast between the conduct and composition of the Assembly and Council. Striking differences.
I don't mean any of this to sound offensive, but this is the way it was. The Assembly was larger as per size, smaller as per attendance (and attention!) and did seem to have a largely rural membership. The discussion was conducted, in general, at very high decibels and very low standards of respect. At several points the debate was so heated that the Speaker actually had to stand and shout for order. He wore the distinct look of a harangued babysitter.
The Council was smaller, had a higher comparative attendance, more organised representatives, a calmer speaker and much higher levels of decorum. Not to mention the discussion, lead by Professor Chandrashekhar, which was far more dignified and if one can say so, intelligent. Quite predictably, the Council had a far more learned group in attendance, who in their dress and mannerisms seemed very urban.
All in all, the whole thing was both very interesting and very boring. I wish we had some sort of translation aids, but then again I should keep dreaming. Whatever it was, it was very surprising in many ways. Legislation was at work. Very contentious issues were being discussed with great enthusiasm. The effectiveness and outcome of the debates is very debate-able though. Also we weren't the only audience there. The seats were filled with many people, several groups of farmers, a few noted NGO representatives. Yes, we got a taster of the heated arguments that the Soudha is infamous for and we saw some sleepy MLAs and it was very disappointing because they proved the stereotypes right. But it was heartening to see our elected representatives concerned about the very issues we worry about, it was good to see them take up issues with genuine passion. I suppose somewhere deep down I believed they'd all be asleep.
In retrospect, it was an illuminating visit. I'm glad I went.